Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. " Governing complex societal problems: The impact of private on public regulation through technological change," Nicolas Schmid & Leonore Haelg & Sebastian Sewerin & Tobias S." Normfare: Norm entrepreneurship in internet governance," Berg, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2022.ĮconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-26.46(9).ĮconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-23. Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. " New school speech regulation as a regulatory strategy against hate speech on social media: The case of Germany's NetzDG," " Elections, Institutions, and the Regulatory Politics of Platform Governance: The Case of the German NetzDG," " Effective Synergy of Market Agents: The Core of Achieving Multi-Agent Governance on the Internet Platform," " Elections, institutions, and the regulatory politics of platform governance: The case of the German NetzDG," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. Berg, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2021.Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. " Consensus on community guidelines: an experimental study on the legitimacy of content removal in social media," Aguerri & Fernando Miró-Llinares & Ana B. " Expanding the debate about content moderation: Scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates," & Sinnreich, Aram & Myers West, Sarah, 2020. Gillespie, Tarleton & Aufderheide, Patricia & Carmi, Elinor & Gerrard, Ysabel & Gorwa, Robert & Matamoros-Fernández, Ariadna & Roberts, Sarah T. Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. " On a global child protection fund financed by international tech companies," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. " Policy Development for Crisis Management in the Context of Sri Lanka," Isuru Koswatte & Chandrika Fernando, 2022.These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one. 113(1), pages 19-37, February.įull references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS) " Does Private Regulation Preempt Public Regulation?,"Īmerican Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. Malhotra, Neil & Monin, Benoãžt & Tomz, Michael, 2019.Haggart, Blayne & Iglesias Keller, Clara, 2021.ĮconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics." Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance," Haggart, Blayne & Keller, Clara Iglesias, 2021." The platform governance triangle: conceptualising the informal regulation of online content," Despite the many limitations of this proposal, it would include more actors in the governance of online speech instead of shielding experts from participatory politics. The Board could then present itself as a legitimate body not because it applies international law but because it encourages the participation of more actors and defers to their judgment. The Board could wield its power to strengthen civil society's participation in Facebook's drafting of content moderation rules. The paper suggests that, instead of hiding its power behind alleged translations of higher principles, the Board could try to build its legitimacy by promoting the wider involvement of civil society. With that goal, the Board has portrayed international human rights law as a set of exogenous and universal principles that human rights experts can translate and implement on social media. It argues that the Board's members perform as apolitical decision-makers. This paper explores two strategies that the Facebook Oversight Board has available to build its own legitimacy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |